PreacherRhetorica
  • Home and to sermons
    • Year B frontispiece >
      • Proper 5B
      • Seventh of Easter
      • Sixth of Easter
      • Fifth of Easter
      • Fourth of Easter homily
      • Third of Easter
      • Second of Easter
      • Easter Day
      • Maundy Thursday
      • Palm Sunday
      • Lent 5
      • Next Before Lent
      • Presentation (Epiphany 4)
      • Third of Epiphany
      • Second of Epiphany
      • Epiphany (2)
      • Epiphany
      • Holy Innocents
      • Christmas
      • The Reign of Christ (Proper 29B)
      • Christ the King (Proper 29B)
      • Proper 28B (2nd Bf Advent)
      • 3rd Bf Advent (CofE)
      • Proper 27B
      • All Saints Sunday
      • Proper 26B
      • Proper 25B
      • Simon and Jude
      • Proper 24B
      • Proper 23B
      • Proper 22B
      • Proper 22B homily
      • Proper 21B
      • Proper 20B
      • Proper 19B
      • Proper 18B sermon
      • Proper 18B performance poem
      • Proper 17B
      • Proper 16B
      • Proper 15B
      • Proper 14B
      • Proper 13B
      • Proper 12B
      • Mary Magdalene homily
      • Proper 11B
      • Proper 10B
      • Proper 9B homily
      • Proper 8B
      • Birth of John the Baptist
      • Proper 7B homily
      • Proper 6B
      • Trinity Sunday
      • Pentecost
      • Lent 4 Mothering Sunday
      • Lent 3
      • Lent 2
      • Lent 1
      • 2nd Before Lent
      • 3rd Before Lent
      • 2nd of Christmas B homily
      • Christmas Day
      • Advent 4B
      • Advent 3B
      • Advent 2B
      • Advent 1B homily
      • Year A frontispiece >
        • Proper 28A (2 Bf Advent)
        • Proper 27A (3 Bf Advent)
        • Proper 26A (4 Bf Advent)
        • Proper 25A Last after Trinity
        • Proper 24A
        • Proper 23A
        • Proper 22A
        • Proper 21A
        • St Matthew
        • Proper 20A
        • Proper 19A
        • Proper 18A
        • Proper 17A
        • Proper 16A
        • Proper 15A
        • Proper 14A
        • Proper 13A
        • Proper 12A
        • Proper 11A
        • Proper 10A
        • Proper 9A
        • Proper 8A
        • Proper 7A
        • Trinity Sunday (Homily)
        • Pentecost
        • Seventh of Easter (Sunday after Ascension)
        • Sixth of Easter
        • Fifth of Easter
        • Fourth of Easter
        • Third of Easter
        • Second of Easter
        • Easter (Poem)
        • Maundy Thursday
        • Palm Sunday
        • Lent 5
        • Lent 4
        • Lent 3
        • Lent 2
        • Lent 1
        • Next Bf Lent (Epiphany last)
        • 2 Bf Lent (Proper 3)
        • Epiphany 7 (RCL)
        • Epiphany 6 (3 Bf Lent)
        • Epiphany 5 (4 Bf Lent)
        • Presentation of Christ
        • Epiphany 3
        • Epiphany 2
        • Baptism of Christ (Epiphany 1)
        • The Epiphany
        • Second Sunday of Christmas
        • First Sunday of Christmas
        • Christmas Day
        • Advent 4A
        • Advent 3A
        • Advent 2A
        • Advent 1A
        • Christ the King Yr A (2)
        • Christ the King Yr A
        • Remembrance Sunday
        • All Saints' Sunday
        • Harvest Homily
        • Harvest
        • Admission of Pastoral Workers
        • Saint Thomas homily
        • Corpus Christi
        • Trinity Sunday
        • Pentecost
        • Pentecost: another example
        • Year C frontispiece >
          • Christ the King (Next bf Advent)
          • Proper 28C (2nd bf Advent)
          • Proper 27C (3rd bf Advent)
          • Proper 26C (4th bf Advent)
          • Proper 25C (Last after Trinity)
          • Proper 24C
          • Proper 23C
          • Proper 22C
          • St Michael & All Angels (homily)
          • Proper 21C
          • Proper 20C
          • Proper 19C (story sermon)
          • Proper 18C
          • Proper 17C
          • Proper 16C
          • Proper 15C
          • Proper 14C
          • Proper 13C
          • Proper 12C
          • Proper 11C
          • Proper 10C
          • Proper 9C
          • Proper 8C
          • Proper 7C
          • Proper 6C performance poem
          • Proper 5C
          • Proper 4C
          • Trinity
          • Pentecost homily
          • Seventh of Easter
          • Ascension Day
          • Sixth of Easter
          • Fifth of Easter
          • Fourth of Easter
          • Third of Easter
          • Second of Easter
          • Easter homily
          • Easter (story sermon)
          • Maundy Thursday
          • Palm Sunday
          • Lent 5C
          • Mothering Sunday
          • Lent 4C homily
          • Lent 3C (story sermon)
          • Lent 2C
          • Lent 1C
          • Ash Wednesday homily
          • Next Bf Lent/Last of Epiphany
          • Epiphany 4 (RCL)
          • Second Before Lent
          • Presentation of Christ
          • Fourth of Epiphany
          • Third of Epiphany
          • Baptism of Christ
          • The Epiphany
          • First of Christmas homily
          • Christmas Day homily
          • Christmas Day
          • Advent 4C
          • Advent 3C
          • Advent 2C
          • Advent 1C
        • Non-lectionary sermons >
          • Plough Sunday
          • Advent and Christmas ideas
          • Christmas Day homily
          • A Christmas Tale
          • Remembrance 2013
          • Remembrance Sunday
          • Harvest homily 2
          • Harvest
          • Harvest homily
          • Harvest Water
          • New Pastoral Ministry
        • Ascension
  • Homiletics
    • A Definition of Preaching
    • Speaking locally
    • Notes from a masterclass
    • Design analysis 1
    • Design analysis 2
    • Encouraging feedback
    • Preaching in an amnesic society
    • The Aldi bag syndrome
    • Blog
  • Disciplecraft
  • Recommended
    • Preaching Fools
  • Second of Epiphany

Finding a discourse for living
Proper 5C
1 Kings 17.17-24; Luke 7.11-17

Picture
This story, which is unique to Luke’s Gospel, is often interpreted through the way it closely mirrors Elijah’s raising of the widow’s son at Zarephath (1 Kings 17.17-24) – surely the way to understand it suggested by today’s ordering of our readings. Here the focus is on the authority of the person through whom the miracle is achieved. Elijah as a ‘man of God’ has direct access to God’s power over life and death. In his exercising of that power the widow is convinced that God is at work in her home
(1 Kgs. 17.24).

Similarly, Jesus’ intervention at the town gate of Nain alerts a large crowd to the fact that ‘a great prophet’ who also  has power over life and death is at work amongst them (Lk. 7.16). Of course, the discussion may well be extended into what Luke means by this close association  of Elijah and Jesus, but that does not detract from the essential point that these miracles indicate God’s real and present  action.

That’s one way into this miracle story, but I want to take another route. I want to ask the question ‘What’s being said to
the fledgling church by the way Luke tells the story? And therefore what is being said to us their successors?’ And I think a little psychological theory can really help.

A psychologically aware interpretation places the focus of the Lucan story in a rather different place than the perspective that dwells on the authority figure who is the agent of restored life.  The reader is told that the deceased ‘was his mother’s only son’; that she was ‘a widow’; that Jesus had ‘compassion for her’; and that Jesus ‘gave’ the restored son ‘to his mother’. The concern of Jesus is principally for the woman rather than the deceased, and the intended focus of attention may well be on her needs rather than a substantiation of divine power. Analysis of the discourses in the story can
provide a way of understanding those needs and how Jesus meets them. 

Undoubtedly compassion for a person recently bereaved is a feature of Jesus’ concern, nevertheless the Gospel writer
offers no explicit evidence of this beyond what is implied by the story’s substance. Instead the incident is couched in terms of the discourse now closed to the women through the death of her only close male relative and the way a new
discourse is opened by Jesus. 

The social location of a widow is of foremost concern in the way the story develops: it all takes place in front of a
large crowd; Jesus addresses her directly though there is no indication that he knows her (ignoring usual social convention); rules about impurity are flouted (Jesus touches the dead man’s bier); and the once dead speaks, thus giving the widow a public voice that his death had taken from her (generally respectable women’s access to public discourse was through a prior relationship with a male member of the household). This restoration of voice is Jesus’ gift (v.15) and
its occurrence is voiced throughout the district and beyond (v.17). That spreading of the word, however, is not prompted by celebration but fear (v.16). It seems to me that there is a discourse of death and a discourse of life at play here. Let me explain.

Discourse analysis examines the way that language constructs how we experience life (Watts, Nye and Savage, 2002, p.
217). Rather than assuming language simply reflects the way things are, discourse analysis posits that language builds social reality. The analyst looks at the language employed and the ways that it is used and seeks to discover what
that usage says about the world and the subjects’ place within it. 

Typically the analyst will look for patterns of emphasis, ways of thinking, recurrent concepts and words, unvoiced
assumptions behind expressions, things that go unnoticed or unremarked on, and other aspects of a group’s ways of expression that makes some things ‘self-evident’ and other things more difficult to even mention.  Discourses ‘create and maintain distinctive social identities’ (Watts et al, p. 217), and are therefore a key feature of an individual’s sense of belonging within a group and also of a group’s location within wider society. In other words, the way things are voiced produces a particular way of living and being.

As a consequence of the death of her only son, the widow from Nain finds herself facing the prospective of discourse so
restricted as to render her effectively silent. As a woman her access to the speaking world was through her male kin –in this case her only son – but now he’s gone there is no one to speak for her and she cannot assume that she can speak for herself. The Hebrew word most often used to translate ‘widow’ (almana) has connotations of voicelessness or silence (Malina and Rohrbaugh, 2003, p. 423) as well as a sense of being forsaken and bound in grief. As ‘a silent one’(and at no point in the story does she speak) the widow is entering a fragile life of incredible vulnerability. Her sonless widowhood is likely to reduce her very life expectancy. Silence – both literally and metaphorically – is deathly.

When Jesus gives the widow back her son, alive again, he is also raising her from social death to life.  But the discourse to which he is admitting her is not simply her old social position restored. Jesus has flouted the conventions of that discourse,
as the large crowd has seen – he has spoken to her when shouldn’t have, and he has made himself impure by his touching of the stretcher with the dead on it. At his point there is no way back to the old ways of talking about things.

Jesus is bringing her into the new ‘Jesus people discourse’ that recognizes him as Lord (v.13) and declares that the time of fulfilment has arrived (v.16b). In Luke’s community the place of the widow is assured and honoured (Acts 9.41), and his gospel underlines that some of the first to experience the liberating word were widows. This is part of the distinctive Christian discourse Luke is teaching his readers. This is a discipleship imperative for every age, since the word that has to be spread (v.17), although some only mention it out of fear. Summoning up all the courage we can, where can we speak in a new way, a Jesus way, which liberates people?

Readers are left to hear for themselves what the new voice of the widow will sound like. We might imagine Luke’s earliest readers listening intently to the voices of the widows amongst them. What is clear is that Jesus overturns the discourse of exclusion that was the widow’s lot.  His voice re-shapes her experience and gives her entry to a new social world where the old conventions no longer have power. Again an agenda for a discipleship ready to challenge the status quo is disclosed in those things. Where and how do we support voices that are re-shaping life in a godly way?

The story tells us that ‘giving voice’ so that a person can be part of a Jesus determined social world is an essential
part both of discipleship and ministerial practice. The psychological understanding of how discourses shape the worlds in which we live alerts us to the power of language and language used as power. It requires us as people of faith to take care in the words we use and the way we use them. It demands that the rhetoric of our speech be committed, responsible and liberating.  As the preacher David Buttrick wrote, ‘Words do not create the world – only God creates with a Word – but language does constitute the world-in-consciousness, the significant social world in which we live. ... ... With words, we name the world (Buttrick, 1987, p. 9). The measure of that metaphorical power is Christ alone. Our task is to shape the
world – literally – with Godly words.

Books used:
Buttrick, David. (1987). Homiletic: Moves and Structures. London: SCM Press.
Malina, Bruce J., and Rohrbaugh, Richard L. (2003). Social-Science Commentary on the Synoptic  Gospels. Minneapolis:
Fortress Press.
Savage, Sara and Boy-Macmillan, Eolene. (2007). The Human Face of the Church. Norwich: Canterbury Press.
Watts, Fraser, Nye, Rebecca and Savage, Sara. (2002). Psychology for Christian Ministry. London: Routledge.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.